उमरिया जज अहमद रज़ा वर्चुअल हियरिंग नहीं करने देते न email का जवाब देते । सुप्रीम कोर्ट और high court के आदेश नहीं मानते। यह सब कार्य उनकी ड्यूटी का भाग नहीं है और जज protection act में कोई छूट नहीं देता।
Mumbai: Police complaint against Umaria Session Judge Ahamed Raza for not replying VC request for criminal revision. The revisionist continuously sending email for VC on many dates but judge never responded. Inspite of VC request he passed the final order and rejected FIR request . The judge is also not following MP High court VC rules which allow hearing from hybrid location. Complaint has been done to Mumbai police to register zero FIR against judgement cum public servant for not discharging duty as per direction of law ie Section 199 BNS AND others.
Supreme Court, Sarvesh Mathur Vs. The Registrar General, High Court of Punjab and Haryana
[Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 351 of 2023]
17. Above all, it must be noted that technology plays an essential role in securing access to courtrooms and as a result, access to justice for citizens across the country. Lawyers and litigants using electronic gadgets to access files and legal materials cannot be asked to turn the clock back and only refer to paper books. In the march of technology, the Courts cannot remain tech averse . Placing fetters on hybrid hearings, like mandating an age criteria, requiring prior application, and frequent denial of access to virtual participants has the direct effect of discouraging lawyers and litigants to use technology. Not only does this affect the efficiency and access to courts, but it also sends out the misguided message that access to courts can be restricted at whim to those who seek justice..

Comments
Post a Comment