Skip to main content

Posts

LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD IPO FRAUD : No Approval Taken From Government For IPO Launch

Recent posts

CRPC 156 Order Cannot be Challanged Under CRPC 397

Allahabad High Court Prof. Ram Naresh Chaudhry S/O Shadri ... vs State Of U.P. Through S.S.P., Station ... on 4 December, 2007 Equivalent citations: 2008CRILJ1515 Author:  Vijay Kumar Verma Bench:  Vijay Kumar Verma JUDGMENT Vijay Kumar Verma, J. 1. "Whether the revision against an order passed under  Section 156(3)  of the Code of Criminal Procedure directing registration of F.I.R. and investigation of the case is maintainable", is the main question that falls for consideration in this revision, which has been preferred against the order dated 20.04.2004 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 14, Gorakhpur in misc. application No. 140 of 2004, whereby S.H.O., P.S. concerned has been directed to investigate the case after lodging the F.I.R. on the basis of the application moved by Prof. Anirudh Prasad (opposite party No. 3). 2. The facts leading to the filing of this revision, in brief, are that Prof. Anirudh Prasad was the Head of Department of Law

HDFC Merger Without SEBI Consent.....

  Mumbai : HDFC LTD and HDFC Bank has been merged without SEBI permission . An RTI filed to SEBI for copy of SEBI comment letter for HDFC merger . The PIO said that the NSE and BSE give NOC to merger and letter is available at their website. As per exchange NOC there was SEBI comment but not copy of the letter. An appeal was filed before SEBI RTI appellate authority . SEBI Appellate authority Mr B Rajendran  denied to give copy of SEBI letter as the said copy is in public domain of exchanges . As BSE and NSE does not covered under RTI act and it is company so the contents of their sites are not reliable. They may have taken verbal comment so SEBI may have no copy on record. Without quoting any section SEBI denied copy of letter .  Question of law is that why SEBI did not upload such letters under section 4 of RTI Act? As per practice supreme court rules 2014 are approved by president of India and GR is passed accordingly . But SC, President , Ministry of Law  RTI section have no copy o

Durg Corruption Court Ordered ACB Inquiry Of SP And SHO In Corruption Complaint FIR Registration

  भ्रष्टाचार कोर्ट ने एसपी और थाना प्रभारी सुपेला , जिला दुर्ग की एसीबी ENQUIRY REPORT मांगी। माइनिंग माफिया से साठगांठ का आरोप  Durg, CG State: Corruption Court Durg Under PC act 1988 and Special Judge Shri Sanjeev Kumar Tamak Ordered preliminary enquiry of corruption complaint against SHO Durgesh Sharma , Supela Police Station and SP durg Police Shalabh Kumar Sinha . There is allegation that both the officers has taken bribe from mining mafia and colonizer Krishna Grand city Khoka Bhilai for illegal mining and transportation . The Builder has used thefted minor minerals ie without TP in construction work and state incurred loss of Rs 70 Cr of royalty and penalty. Illegal mining and transportation is offence under IPC 379,413, 420,120B etc with section 21 of MMDR . No preliminary enquiry done as per Lalita Kumari SC Order and registered FIR . SP and SHO taken huge advantage from mining mafia to avoid action. During hearing complainant said that both have huge disproprionate assests an

SEBI Is Hiding Adani-Hindenburg Investigation Team Details - RTI

 SEBI OFFICERS HAVE RISK TO LIFE THREAT IN ADANI CASE Mumbai: SEBI has been directed by Supreme court to do investigation of Adani Hindenburg case as per SEBI act 1992  As per law SEBI board appoints adjudicating officer as per SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (PROCEDURE FOR HOLDING INQUIRY AND IMPOSING PENALTIES BY ADJUDICATING OFFICER) RULES, 1995.  https://www.sebi.gov.in/sebi_data/attachdocs/apr-2017/1492086713679.pdf The officer  has power to investigate the irregularities and impose penalty as per section 15 and 24 of SEBI act . The details of adjudicating officers and types of investigation and final report is public documents . SEBI denied to provide information about the adjudicating officers and investigation team members in an RTI reply . They also not provided email ID and contact number of investigation team . SEBI denied it under section 8 of RTI act 2005. People will never know the officers or team details which are probing Adani Hindenburg case.  SEBI also not cal