Skip to main content

SEBI COURT MUMBAI ORDERED FIR INVESTIGATION IN RADHE DEVELOPERS AND BSE IPO FRAUD

RADHE DEVELOPER IPO LISTED AT BSE WITHOUT SEBI PERMISSION.

SEBI COURT DIRECTED FIR AND INVESTIGATION TO SEBI WHICH IS INVESTIGATION AGENCY.

सेबी कोर्ट मुंबई ने राधे डेवलपर और BSE के आईपीओ घोटाले में सेबी को जाँच के आदेश दिए ।  सेबी ने शिकायत पर जाँच नहीं की और आरोपियों को लाभ दिया।  सेबी जज श्री रवि म जाधव ने मामला समझा और निवेशकों के हित में जांच का आदेश दिया।  BSE ने राधे डेवलपर को बिना सेबी मंजूरी के लिस्ट किया और दोनों निवेशकों को 1995 से चूना लगा रहे है...  


 

Mumbai: SEBI court Mumbai directed SEBI to conduct investigation in Radhe Developers Limited Shares IPO fraud. Complainant Cum Investor says that Radhe Developers (India) LTD listed at BSE on 7/12/1995 at Bombay Stock Exchange. The Bombay Stock exchange listed Radhe developers without full SEBI compliance. The Complainant said that SEBI scores failed to take action on complaint and SEBI grievance officer closed his complaint without any action. Complainant said that as per SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (PROCEDURE FOR HOLDING INQUIRY  AND IMPOSING PENALTIES RULES, 1995) SEBI is duty bound to conduct inquiry on investors complaint. No summons or preliminary inquiry conducted by SEBI  . After receiving the complaint the SEBI court Judge Shri Ravi M Jadhav under CRPC 156(3) ordered investigation in this IPO fraud. Complainant filed CRPC 156 complaint at Bandra Court to register FIR under SEBI act 15 HA,15 HB etc but MM Court said that only SEBI court has power under section 26 of SEBI act 1992. Taking this on record the SEBI court directed SEBI to conduct investigation on complaint . Now SEBI will appoint adjudicating officer(AO) and conduct investigation with penalty on Radhe Developer and BSE . Radhe Developers (India) Limited is Ahmedabad based real estate company . In Scores reply company said that it has lost the IPO documents during office shifting and shared complaint with police station stamp with investor. SEBI told in RTI reply that no documents are available on record .  As per section 15 HA the BSE and Company may be penalize with 3 times of profit by SEBI if found guilty. Till date SEBI has not appointed AO 

All the states have SEBI court in their capital . If SEBI failed to take action on SCORES Complaint or Email complaint then Aggrieved party can approach SEBI court in this pre cognizance stage. The court can take cognizance only after report from SEBI officer but it can direct investigation to SEBI in this pre cognizance stage  . The offence under SEBI act are cognizable and SEBI is bound to take action as on each and every complaint. The SEBI Special judge follow CRPC as per section 26 D of SEBI act so it has power to direct investigation to SEBI as SEBI is also investigation agency like police , CBI, ED as per section 11 D. As per SC order revision of CRPC 156 investigation order is not permitted . High court cannot quash FIR or investigation order.


IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

1.SAPAN SHRIVASTAVA

Male , Age 47 , Occup: Media reporter (Legal)

D 102 , Natraj Darshan, Ganesh Nagar Chowk,

Dombivali West , Thane 421202        

Cell 9702859636   , Email indiartinews@gmail.com          

 2. VEERENDRA ABHISHEK    

  Male Age 51 , Occup : Media

Main road ,  Near Sai Mandir Gate,

 Tulsipura , Rajnandgaon (CG) 491441

Cell 7000288849                                                    ...Complainant

    

                              VERSUS

1.ASHISH P PATEL

Age 50 Approx, Male , Occp: CEO and MD Radhe Developer

 Radhe Developers (India) Ltd.

RADHE ACRES, Block No. 220, 226 & 227,
B/h. Applewoods Township,,Shela,Ahmedabad 380058

 

2.  Khyati K Patel

Age 50 Approx, Female , Occp: Company Secretary & Compliance Officer

 Radhe Developers (India) Ltd.

RADHE ACRES, Block No. 220, 226 & 227,
B/h. Applewoods Township,,Shela,Ahmedabad 380058

 

3. PRAMOD AGARWAL

Age 60 Approx, Male , Occp: Chairman

BSE India, Floor 25, P J Towers, Dalal Street, Mumbai 400001

4. SUNDARARAMAN RAMAMURTHY

Age 60 Approx, Male , Occp: MD and CEO (BSE)

BSE India, Floor 25, P J Towers, Dalal Street, Mumbai 400001

5. SEBI

Through Its Chairperson, BKC , Bandra , Mumbai.........                        Accused 


O R D E R


1. The SEBI (respondent No. 5) is directed to investigate into the matter and take action if any, according to law against the respondents No. 1 to 4.

2. The Exh. 1 certified copy of the complaint be sent to SEBI (respondent No. 5) for investigation. The SEBI (respondent No.5) to submit its action report after due investigation.

3. Inform SEBI (respondent No. 5) accordingly.


CITY CIVIL AND SESSION COURT MUMBAI

Case Details
Case TypeFiling NumberFiling DateRegistration NumberRegistration DateCNR Number
SEBI MA104764/202418-03-2024100400/202418-03-2024MHCC020045882024
Case Status
First Hearing DateDecision DateCase StatusNature of DisposalCourt Number and Judge
18-March-202423-January-2025Case DisposedContested - DISPOSSED OFF22-COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Petitioner and Advocate

  • 1) Sapan Shrivastava and Other 1

  • 2) Veerendra Abhishek

    Advocate - Sapan Shrivastava
Respondent and Advocate

  • 1) Ashish P Patel and Other 4

  • 2) Khyati K Patel, Radhe Dev

  • 3) Pramod Agarwal,bse

  • 4) Sundararaman Ramamurthy,bse

  • 5) Sebi Thr Chairperson

Acts
Under Act(s)Under Section(s)
Securities and Exchange Board of India Act15HA
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE156
Case History
Registration NumberJudgeBusiness On DateHearing DatePurpose of hearing
100400/2024COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE18-03-202406-04-2024HEARING
100400/2024COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE06-04-202408-05-2024HEARING
100400/2024COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE08-05-202426-06-2024HEARING
100400/2024COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE26-06-202404-07-2024HEARING
100400/2024COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE04-07-202416-07-2024HEARING
100400/2024COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE16-07-202414-08-2024HEARING
100400/2024COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE14-08-202404-09-2024HEARING
100400/2024COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE04-09-202423-10-2024HEARING
100400/2024COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE23-10-202416-11-2024HEARING
100400/2024COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE16-11-202428-11-2024HEARING
100400/2024COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE28-11-202406-12-2024HEARING
100400/2024COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE06-12-202423-12-2024COMPLIANCE
100400/2024COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE23-12-202414-01-2025COMPLIANCE
100400/2024COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE14-01-202523-01-2025ORDER
100400/2024COURT 22 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE23-01-2025Disposed

Final Order
Order NumberOrder DateOrder Details
123-01-2025Order


IN THE DESIGNATED SPECIAL COURT UNDER SEBI ACT, 1992 FOR MAHARASHTRA STATE

AT COURT ROOM NO.22, CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT, GREATER MUMBAI

SEBI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.400 OF 2024


 

1.   Sapan Shrivastavaa

Age : 47, Occ.: Media reporter (legal)

R/at : D 102, Natraj Darshan, Ganesh Nagar Chowk, Dombivali West, Thane.

 

2.   Veerendra Abhishek

Age : 51 years, Occ. : Media

R/at : Main road, Near Sai Mandir Gate,

Tulsipura, Rajnandgaon.                                                    … Applicants Vs.

1.   Ashish P. Patel Age : 50 years,

Occ. : CEO and MD Radhe Developer

 

2.   Khyti K. Patel Age : 50 years,

Occ.: Company Secretary and Compliance Officer,

 

Respondent No. 1 and 2 address are : Radhe Developers (India) Ltd.,

Radhe Acres, Block No. 220, 226 and 227, B/h. Applewoods Towinship,

Shela, Ahmedabad.

3.   Pramod Agarwal

Age : 60 years, Occ. : Chairman,

 

4.   Sundararaman Ramamurthy

Age : 60 years, Occ. : MD and CEO (BSE)

 

Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 address are :

BSE India, floor 25, P. J. Towers, Dalal Street, Mumbai.

 

5.   SEBI

Through its Chairperson, BKC,

Bandara, Mumbai.                                                                         … Respondents

 

Appearances :- Applicant in person.

 

CORAM :    H. H. THE SEBI SPECIAL JUDGE,

R. M. JADHAV (C.R. NO.22)

DATED :    23rd January, 2025

( O R A L    O R D E R )

Dictated and pronounced in the open Court)

 

Perused complaint supported by affidavit below Exh. 07 of complainant Sapan Shrivastava. Heard applicant Sapan Shrivastava in person. Gone through the compliant and documents filed along with the complaint.

 

2.                     It is submitted by Sapan Shrivastava that respondents No. 1 and 2 Radhe Developer is the listed company at BSE on 07.12.1995. The Radhe Builder has listed IPO without the SEBI compliance. The SEBI has issued circular dated 18.06.1992 which all the exchanges have to obey as they are in the interest of the investors. The SEBI has denied

compliance by the respondents No.1 and 2 for listing of Radhe Devel- oper at Bombay Stock Exchange. The petitioner Sapan Shrivastava is the investors of the Radhe Developer. Many complaints have been regis- tered against respondents No. 3 but no action has been taken to con- duct the inquiry and investigation. The SEBI is bound to conduct the in- quiry but no action has been taken which constrained the complainant/applicants to file the present complaint seeking directions under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C.

 

3.                                   It is further submitted by Sapan Shrivastava that earlier he has made complaint before the Ld. MM Court, Bandra. However, the Ld. MM Court returned the complaint to file the same in appropriate Court having jurisdiction. Hence, this complaint is filed before this Court. Lastly it is submitted by Sapan Shrivastava that he being investors along with other investors got cheated by the respondents No. 1 to 4 and the SEBI inspite of the complaint made has not taken action against them.

 

4.                                   It appears that the complainant has filed Exh. A which goes to show that the respondents No.1 Radhe Developer is a listed company at BSE. Further, the complainant has produced on record the guidelines of the SEBI dated 18.07.1992 below Exh.B. The complainant has also produced on record the final status of his compliant given to SEBI against Radhe Developer below Exh. C. He placed on record the letter/ correspondence given to Finance Minster, Union of India below Exh. D. He also produced some letters and mails.

 

5.                                   The compliance has produced on record the copy of order dated 17.01.2024 passed by Ld. MM Court, Bandra in CC No. 190/

Misc/2023. The Ld. MM vide above order appears to have returned complaint of complainant observing that cognizance of offence under SEBI act can only be taken by Special Court.

 

6.                                   The complainant has produced on record along with Exh. 5 the information showing that he is the investors of the Radhe Developer. I have considered the allegations made in the complaint and the docu- ment produced on record.

 

7.                                   It would be apposite to mention here that the Section 26 of the SEBI Act provides that - “No Court shall take cognizance of any of- fence punishable under this Act or any rules or regulations made there under save on a complaint made by the Board. Admittedly, this is not the complaint filed by the board of whose cognizance can be taken by this Court.”

 

8.                                   It is pertinent to mention here that the SEBI conduct inves- tigation in the matters relating to the securities market through its ma- chinery and upon investigation if any violation is notice proposes for ac- tion to be taken including the action of filing the complaint before the SEBI Court.

 

9.                                   It would be relevant to mention here that the complainant is seeking for directions to the SEBI to investigate the matter as per Sec- tion 156(3) of Cr.P.C. So, the question of taking cognizance of the of- fence does not arise. The complainant by this petition is raising griev- ance with prayer of investigation to be done by the SEBI so that it will enable the SEBI either to take any action or not.

10.                               Prima facie the material on record goes to show that the complainant Sapan Shrivastava is the investors of the Radhe Builder. He has made complaint with the SEBI against Radhe Developer for non compliance of the SEBI Act and Regulations in issuing the IPO and fraudulent practice. The complainant Sapan Shrivastava has also filed his affidavit below Exh. 07 in respect of the allegations made in the compliant/ petition.

 

11.                               According to Section 11 (1) of the SEBI Act subject to pro- vision to this Act it shall be the duty of the board to protect the interest of the investors in securities and promote the development of and to regulate the securities market by such measures as it thinks fit. Accord- ing to Section 11C(1) where the board has reasonable ground to believe that (a) the transaction in securities are being dealt with in a manner detrimental to the investors or the securities market it may order to in- vestigate.

 

12.                               This being the function of the SEBI in the interest of in- vestors, I found that the allegations made in the complaint are required to be dealt with by the SEBI. The complainant Sapan Shrivastava is the investors and he alleged about the fraudulent activity of the respon- dents No. 1 and 2 Radhe Developer and the respondents No. 3 and 4 the authorities of Bombay Stock Exchange in listing the respondents No. 1 and 2 and issuing IPO without making any SEBI compliance detrimen- tal to the interest of the investors.

 

13.                               Certainly, the SEBI is at liberty to file the complaint if upon investigation it transpired to it that the alleged violations if any are

committed by the respondents No. 1 to 4. The SEBI may dropped the proceeding if, no violations are revealed upon investigation. But, the in- vestigation needs to be done by the SEBI in the interest of the investors including the complainant Sapan Shrivastava to be one of the investor of the respondents No.1 and 2 Radhe Developer. In the given set of fact and circumstances, I pass the following order :-

 

O R D E R

 

1.            The SEBI (respondent No. 5) is directed to investigate into the matter and take action if any, according to law against the re- spondents No. 1 to 4.

2.            The Exh. 1 certified copy of the complaint be sent to SEBI (re- spondent No. 5) for investigation. The SEBI (respondent No. 5) to submit its action report after due investigation.

3.            Inform SEBI (respondent No. 5) accordingly.

4.            Miscellaneous Application No.400 of 2024 is disposed off.

 

Digitally signed by RAVI MANOHARRAO JADHAV

Date: 2025.01.23

17:35:35

+0530

( R. M. Jadhav ) SEBI SPECIAL JUDGE,

Date : 23.01.2025                            CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS COURT, GREATER MUMBAI.

 

Directly typed on Computer on                                             : 23.01.2025 Signed on           : 23.01.2025

 

 

“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”

 

UPLOAD DATE AND TIME                                  Name of Stenographer

23.01.2025 at 5.30 p.m.                                        Mrs. Manasi Kadam

Name of the Judge ( With Court Room No.)

H.H.J. R. M. JADHAV

(Court Room No.22)

Date       of                Pronouncement                of JUDGMENT/ORDER

23.01.2025

JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by

P.O. on

23.01.2025

JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on

23.01.2025

 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court VC Video Conferencing Link

  ALL DAYS THIS LINKS ARE WORKING....NO CHANGES Seen. PLZ DONT MISUSE IT Video conferencing link common for all days. S.NO. COURT NO. COURT LINKS 1. Court No. 1 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court01 2. Court No. 2 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court02 3. Court No. 3 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court03 4. Court No. 4 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court04 5. Court No. 5 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court05 6. Court No. 6 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court06 7. Court No. 7 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court07 8. Court No. 8 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court08 9. Court No. 9 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court09          9A Court no.10            https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court10 10. Court No. 11 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court11 11. Court No. 12 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court12 12. Court No. 13 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court13...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bhopal Police Officers Inspectors Mobile Number and E mail ID

  OFFICERS LIST IGP TO TI POLICE OFFICERS CUG NUMBER LIST BHOPAL S.NO. POSTING RANK NAME P&T PBX CUG NO. E-MAIL 1 BHOPAL ADGP SHRI A SAI MANOHAR 2443599 407 9479990399 bhopalig@gmail.com 2 CITY/BPL DIG/CITY SHRI IRSHAD WALI 2443201 408 7049100401 dig_bhopal@mppolice.gov.in 3 DIG/ RANGE/ RURAL DIG/RURAL SHRI SANJAY TIWARI 2443499 305 7587628122 digbplrange09@gmail.com 4 BHOPAL SP (HQ) SHRI RAMJI  SHRIVASTAV 2443223 367 7049100405 sp_bhopal@mppolice.gov.in 5 BHOPAL SP (SOUTH) SHRI SAI KRISHNA THOTA 2443800 359 9479990500 spsouth_bhopal@gmail.com 6 BHOPAL SP (NORTH) SHRI VIJAY KUMAR KHATRI 2443320 377 9479990700 spnorth320@gmail.com 7 BHOPAL ASP (HQ) SMT RICHA COUBE 2677319 319 7587615141 asphqbpl@gmail.com 8 BHOPAL AIG SMT RASHMI MISHRA 2443804 9479990620 bhopalig@gmail.com 9 BHOPAL ASP(CYBER)CRIME VACANT 2920664 7587628201 asp.cybercrime-bpl@mppolice.gov.in 10 BHOPAL ASP(CRIME) SHRI GOPAL DHAKAD 2761651 ...
5 comments
Read more

Complaint At Bar Council Against Senior Advocate Ashish Kamat By Advocate Vijay Kurle Of Bombay High Court.....

ADVOCATE VIJAY KURLE, SEEKS DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST SENIOR ADVOCATE ASHISH KAMAT FOR HIS AMATEUR TRICKS IN PROTECTING WHITE COLLARED SCAMMERS Advocate Vijay Kurle known for fearlessly standing with the underprivileged victims of manipulation by powerful real estate sharks, corrupt private sector and government officials, who are out to tear the fabric of the society. Adv Vijay kurle and Adv Ashish kamat Recently Advocate Kurle wrote to ‘Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa’ seeking action against Senior Advocate Ashish Kamat for his juvenile conduct to delay prosecution of scammers of thousands of crores of government and insurance policyholder’s funds by private insurance companies and their senior officials.   Top private insurance companies, cheated the government and small-time policy holders, through the following dubious means - A. Enrolling ghost beneficiaries and collecting thousands of crores of government sponsored insurance premium, meant for the farmers and underp...
3 comments
Read more

Maharashtra Health Directory Mobile and Email address DHO, Civil Surgeon , Directors

  Contacts Ministers Back Minister Name Contact No. Mail ID   Prof.Dr.Tanajirao Sawant Hon. Minister Public Health and Family Welfare     (O) min.familywelafre@gmail.com     (F) Minister of State Name Contact No. Shri.  Hon. State Minister, Public Health 22886025 (O) 22023992 (F) Officers Name Contact No. Mail ID Project Director, Maharashtra State Aids Control Society 24113097/5619/5791   (O) pd@mahasacs.org Shri Shivanand Taksale (I.A.S.) CEO, State Health Assurance Society 24999203/204/205 (O)   Mantralaya State Public Health Department,  Mantralaya, Mumbai Telephone - 22610018 Officers Name Department / Section Telephone No in the workshop Expanded Mobile No Email IDs Subject Shri.Sanjay Khandare (I.A.S) Principal Secretary-1. 22617388 22632166 22617999 (F)             204         PA 216  Anti 211   psec.pubhealth@maharashtra.gov.in...
Post a Comment
Read more

ACB Judge Mumbai Want To Argue Matter Without Case Number

  ACB JUDGE SHASHIKALA S NAGUR MUMBAI SESSION WANT TO ARGUE MATTER WITHOUT CASE NUMBER. WHY JUDGE GIVING SPECIAL TREATMENT TO THIS CASE? ALL THE CASES ARE ARGUING DURING FILING STAGE OR WITHOUT CAUSELIST LISTING? Mumbai: The complainant filed three contempt petitions against ACB MUMBAI officers for not registering Zero FIR against Thane District Judge SB Agarwal, ADJ Amit Shete and JMFC Smt GS Bora for doing corruption in judicial process under section 7&13 of PC ACT 1992. The ACB officers disobeyed SC Lalita Kumari directions and contempt filed as per para 3 of the Lalita Kumari judgment.  The registry raised maintainability question to petitioner .Petitioner referred SC judgment that registry cannot decide maintainability of petition. As per the ACB judge Shashikala verbal direction registry is not numbering contempt petition . Clerks are afraid to number petition as ACB officers are having well wishers in session court. They are insisting petitioner to argue with judge ...
2 comments
Read more

MP Police Directory DGP Mobile Number Sudhir Saxena

MADHYA PRADESH POLICE TELEPHONE DIRECTORY I D S N B R A N C H N A M E D E S I G N A I O N S T D  C O D E O F F I C E R E S I F A X 1 F A X 2 M O B I L E CUG E  M A I L A D D R E S S 1 1 D G P  O F F I C E S u r e n d r a  S i n h D G P 0 7 5 5 2 4 4 3 5 0 0 2 4 4 3 3 3 6 2 4 4 3 5 0 1 94 25 01 45 35 70 49 10 00 01 dgp mp @m ppo lic e.g ov .in C-1 0, Swa mi Da ya na nd N ag ar Bh op al 2 2 M i l i n d  K a n s k e r A D G / P S O 7 5 5 2 4 4 3 5 2 6 2 4 4 3 5 2 8 8 9 8 9 9 9 7 2 7 7 7 0 4 9 1 0 0 5 1 0  p s o d g p m p @ m p p o l i c e . g o v . i n  D - 2 / 1 9 , C h a r  I m l i 3 3 P r a d e e p  B h a t i y a J D . ( P  R ) 0 7 5 5 2 4 4 3 5 0 5 2 4 9 1 1 7 2 9 4 2 5 1 7 1 1 1 3 H - 3 9 5 , S a i  A d h a r s h i l a  B a r k h e d a 4 4 D . P .  J u g a d e P S  T o  D G P 0 7 5 5 2 4 4 3 5 0 2 9 8 2 6 0 3 6 5 9 3 7049100502 134-A SEC-Sarvadharm Colony, 5 5 N . K .  S h r i v a s t a v a P S  T o...
1 comment
Read more

Free Cancer Treatment at Sheth Shree Rasiklal Manikchandji Dhariwal Cancer Hospital Valsad

  *सूरत, गुजरात से मुम्बई के राजमार्ग पर सूरत से ७८ किलोमीटर  वलसाड से 16 km ( सुरतकी तरफ)  पर वाघलधारा गाँव है । राइट हेंड साइड पर आपको "श्री प्रभव हेम कामधेनु गीरीविहार ट्रस्ट, पालीताणा" संचालित "श्री रसिकलाल माणिकचंद धारीवाल कैंसर हॉस्पिटल" की कमान दिखाई देगी । हजारो चोरस मिटर मै फैला फल, फूल, खेत से हराभरा ये संकुल कोई आश्रम से कम नही। यहाँ अति सुंदर  जैन मंदिर एवं विशाल भोजन शाला भी है । ऒंर यहां की गौंशाला में करीब 400  देशी गाय है । यहां कैंसर के मरीज़ (दर्दी) एवं एक साथी को 10 दिन उपचार एवं ट्रेनिंग के लिए रखा जाता है । 80 बेड उपलब्ध है।  नास्ता, लंच और डिनर के समय दर्दी से मिल सकते है।* *सुबह ९ बजे आपको सिर्फ ५० रुपये मे केस निकलवाना है । अपने साथ मरीज़ (दर्दी) की केस फाइल एवं अगर ऑपरेशन, केमो करवाई हो तो वो साथ ले जानी है । सुबह १०.३० से १२.३० और दोपहर ३.३० से ५.३० दरमियान डॉक्टर द्वारा दर्दी की जांच के बाद १० दिन के लिए एडमिट किया जाता है । केवल दर्दी एवं एक साथी को ही प्रवेश की अनुमति है। ऐसी स्थिति में दर्दी को बिलकुल मुफ्त एवं साथी को ११ दिन क...
Post a Comment
Read more

IPO Fraud By Bharat Global Developer Limited ......

  भारत ग्लोबल डेवलपर लिमिटेड शेयर बिना सेबी की मंजूरी के लिस्ट हो गया और निवेशकों को अरबों का चूना लगाया।  सेबी चेयरमैन और बड़े अधिकारी बीएसई  पर कोई कार्यवाही नहीं कर रहे ।  भारी घूस लेने की आशंका ! रक्षक ही भक्षक बना! Mumbai: Gujrat based company Bharat Global Developer Limited ie BGDL listed at BSE on 21 March 1995 without SEBI compliance.As per SEBI RTI Reply the BGDL has not done SEBI compliance and BSE listed it against regulator permission. BSE done it for  exchange charges and cheated innocent investors.Recently SEBI banned BGDL share trading in Dec 2024 for misleading orders announcement. On 11 April 2025  SEBI permitted BGDL share trading without checking SEBI compliance certificate. SEBI Whole time director SEBI Shri Kamlesh Chandra Varshney corruptly lifted ban on trading inspite of many complaints . SEBI new chairman Tuhin Kanta pandey and others WTD are silent on complaint of no IPO compliance by BGDL and BSE crime. The corrupt SEBI officers a...
6 comments
Read more

Contempt Case Against Mumbai Session Court Staff For Obstruction Of Justice

  सेशन कोर्ट कर्मचारियों की गुंडागर्दी , E  FILING केस का Printout मांगते है , कोई नियम नहीं मानते।  Mumbai : Brijesh Sharma of Mira Road  filed contempt petition under section 15 of contempt of court act  against Mumbai session court Registrar and Criminal section sub-registrar for not assigning matter to court by e filing. Mr Brijesh Sharma filed 3 cases before ACB court Mumbai for registration of FIR under PC act 1988 by e filing. As routine manner the staff insist for physical copy of matter. Mr brijesh replied that as per Bombay high court e filing rules no physical copy is required to be submitted . The Principal session and District judge Mr Subramanium also not addressed the complaint . The registry denied to obey bombay High Court e filing rules and not listed the complaint before ACB court . Then he filed contempt petition by e filing . After seeing contempt case the registry allocated the matter to court without printout . As they holded the matter fo...
1 comment
Read more

Chhattisgarh CG Police Official Mobile numbers

    S.N.   Name   Designation Office   Cell/ Mobile No. Code Number DGP Office, PHQ, Raipur 1 Shri Ashok Juneja DGP 0771 2221100 94791- 90444 0771 2211201 2 Shri Bhagwati Singh PRO (DGP) 0771 2511850 - Intelligence 3 Dr. Aanand Chhabra IG, Intelligence 0771 2436525 94252- 58168 0771 2436200(F) - 4 Shri Abhishek Maheshwari AIG (Intelligence)     90986- 73147 5 Shri M.L. Kotwani AIG (Intelligence) 0771 2436526 94252- 34323 P&P/Technical Services/Telecom/Traffic/Rail/Cyber/...
Post a Comment
Read more