BHARTI AIRTEL IPO WAS NOT SEBI APPROVED .....FRAUD WITH THE INVESTORS

 




Mumbai:  Bharti Airtel Listed its IPO on 18 Feb 2002 on BSE and NSE. The investor demanded the SEBI NOC or Permission from this IPO as company did not claimed by SEBI SCORES Portal. The IPO size was Rs 834Cr approx . The company compliance officer failed to provide SEBI NOC copy to investors. The Company claiming the exchange NOC but company also not shared exchange NOC . Exchange did not give NOC they forward the Draft of IPO to SEBI as per ICDR guidelines. Company failed to share any NOC in SEBI Scores complaint. The SEBI officer was bribed and he also not forwarded complaint to SEBI board for action. Company cheated millions of investors in the name of IPO and used public interest free money since last 23 years to expand business.  SEBI is hub of corruption against investors interest and failing to discharge duty. This is same type of SAHARA case and SEBI is Silent because bribe is received . 

Any investor can filed Police FIR Under IPC or BNS against company promoters . RTI reply from SEBI is awaited . As company have no NOC copy then it will be difficult as SEBI may have positive information.





Bharti airtel Limited launched its IPO on 18 Feb 2002 without SEBI permission. No SEBI NOC and permission available at SEBI portal. RHP is also missing with no material documents. It is violation of section 73 of Company act 1956 ,many SEBI circulars etc. Conduct enquiry and investigation as per 1995 rule and direct company return public money as per  company act 1956 and  of SCRA 1956. Also take action as per section 15 HA of sebi act against Bharti airtel.


As on : 09-12-2025 03:53

SebiWorkflow
Complaint History : SEBIE/MH25/THAN/048898/1
Sr. No.ActionRemarksSupporting FileDateAction Taken byAuto Assigned to
1
Complaint Lodged
Please refer to complaint details above --
28-11-2025
Sapan Shrivastava
2
Auto Assigned To Entity
--
28-11-2025
Sapan Shrivastava
Bharti Airtel Ltd
3
Copy Mark to Designated Body
--
28-11-2025
Sapan Shrivastava
Harshada Shinde (bombay Stock Exchange Ltd.)
4
ATR submitted to Investor
Dear sir, Please find enclosed the companys reply to your grievance. --
02-12-2025
Bharti Airtel Ltd
Sapan Shrivastava
5
First Level Review
Bharti airtel claiming SEBI permission or NOC but not ready to share copy with investor. In annual report there is no copy of SEBI NOC for IPO. Take action as per section 15HA of SEBI act 1992 --
03-12-2025
Sapan Shrivastava
6
Auto Assigned To Designated Body
--
03-12-2025
Sapan Shrivastava
Harshada Shinde (bombay Stock Exchange Ltd.)
7
ATR submitted to Investor
In this connection we wish to inform you that SCORES shall only be a facilitative platform for complainants to get redressal of their grievances from the concerned entity. Information given to SEBI regarding violation of any of the provisions of the securities laws are in nature of Market Intelligence. The information provided on such matters will be treated as confidential market intelligence and not as a complaint on SCORES. Complainant may approach MI Portal of SEBI SCORES. --
04-12-2025
Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd.
Sapan Shrivastava
8
Second level review
It is violation of section 73 of company act 1956 and SEBI ICDR regulation. Take action as per 15 HA of SEBI act 1992 --
04-12-2025
Sapan Shrivastava
9
Auto Assigned To SEBI
--
04-12-2025
Sapan Shrivastava
Abhishek Pandya (vandana Kumar)
10
Copy mark to SEBI SEBI
--
04-12-2025
Sapan Shrivastava
Vandana Kumar (krishnanand Raghavan)
11
ATR submitted to SEBI
Dear Sir, Kindly refer the response of the Company in respect to this complaint --
05-12-2025
Bharti Airtel Ltd
Abhishek Pandya (vandana Kumar)
12
Case Dispose Off
On perusal of the complaint, it is observed that the complaint is relating to corporate governance related issues, which are not taken up on SCORES. Further, to deal with such matters, SEBI has launched the MI Portal, wherein such complaints are being taken up. Accordingly, the complainant is requested to lodge his complaint on MI Portal at mi.sebi.gov.in In view of the aforesaid information, the present complaint is being disposed in SCORES. --

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post