Mumbai : Brijesh Sharma of Mira Road filed contempt petition under section 15 of contempt of court act against Mumbai session court Registrar and Criminal section sub-registrar for not assigning matter to court by e filing. Mr Brijesh Sharma filed 3 cases before ACB court Mumbai for registration of FIR under PC act 1988 by e filing. As routine manner the staff insist for physical copy of matter. Mr brijesh replied that as per Bombay high court e filing rules no physical copy is required to be submitted . The Principal session and District judge Mr Subramanium also not addressed the complaint . The registry denied to obey bombay High Court e filing rules and not listed the complaint before ACB court . Then he filed contempt petition by e filing . After seeing contempt case the registry allocated the matter to court without printout . As they holded the matter for 45 days for non genuine reason petitioner is following criminal contempt against session court officers. In an RTI reply from session court no judg given any written request to registry to provide hard copy of case . In spite of no request the registry harassing litigants for printout as they are above the law.
Supreme Court,Sarvesh Mathur Vs. The Registrar
General, High Court of Punjab and Haryana
[Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 351 of 2023]
16. Above all, it must be noted that technology
plays an essential role in securing access to courtrooms and as a result,
access to justice for citizens across the country. Lawyers and litigants using electronic gadgets to access files and
legal materials cannot be asked to turn the clock back and only refer to paper
books. In the march of technology,
the Courts cannot remain tech averse.
Placing fetters on hybrid hearings, like mandating
an age criteria, requiring prior application, and frequent denial of access to
virtual participants has the direct effect of discouraging lawyers and
litigants to use technology. Not only does this affect the efficiency and
access to courts, but it also sends out the misguided message that access to
courts can be restricted at whim to those who seek justice.
17. The use
of technology by the Bar and the Bench is no longer an option but a necessity.
Members of the Bench, the Bar and the litigants must aid each other to create a
technologically adept and friendly environment. The above directions must be
implemented by all concerned stakeholders in letter and in spirit.
| 15 | MISC APPLN ACB/101402/2025 | Brijesh Sharma Versus Sachin Jadhav and Other 2 | |
| 16 | MISC APPLN ACB/101401/2025 | Brijesh Sharma Versus Manohar Bhosle and Other 2 | |
| 17 | MISC APPLN ACB/101400/2025 | Brijesh Sharma Versus Sunita Shankar Dhakne and Other 2 |
CITY CIVIL AND SESSION COURT MUMBAI
| Case Type | Filing Number | Filing Date | Registration Number | Registration Date | CNR Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MISC APPLN ACB | 116980/2025 | 10-10-2025 | 101402/2025 | 10-10-2025 | MHCC020166202025 |
| First Hearing Date | Next Hearing Date | Case Status | Stage of Case | Court Number and Judge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-October-2025 | 11-February-2026 | Pending | HEARING | 46-COURT 46 ADDL SESSION JUDGE |
| Under Act(s) | Under Section(s) |
|---|---|
| Contempt Of Court Act | 2(c), 15(2) |
| Registration Number | Judge | Business On Date | Hearing Date | Purpose of hearing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101402/2025 | COURT 46 ADDL SESSION JUDGE | 10-10-2025 | 01-11-2025 | HEARING |
| 101402/2025 | COURT 46 ADDL SESSION JUDGE | 01-11-2025 | 07-11-2025 | HEARING |
| 101402/2025 | COURT 46 ADDL SESSION JUDGE | 07-11-2025 | 18-11-2025 | HEARING |
| 101402/2025 | COURT 46 ADDL SESSION JUDGE | 18-11-2025 | 08-12-2025 | HEARING |
| 101402/2025 | COURT 46 ADDL SESSION JUDGE | 08-12-2025 | 19-12-2025 | HEARING |
| 101402/2025 | COURT 46 ADDL SESSION JUDGE | 19-12-2025 | 24-12-2025 | HEARING |
| 101402/2025 | COURT 46 ADDL SESSION JUDGE | 24-12-2025 | 07-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 101402/2025 | COURT 46 ADDL SESSION JUDGE | 07-01-2026 | 27-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 101402/2025 | COURT 46 ADDL SESSION JUDGE | 27-01-2026 | 11-02-2026 | HEARING |
Same thing are happening in jmfc , specially kurla court room 57th , name JC Pawar and staff even clerks
ReplyDelete