Skip to main content

Contempt: Advocate Have Special Powers In Court Room...


Contempt of Court by the Judge includes contempt of court:


The following examples give a clear idea of ​​how much the Law Advocate seeks to uphold his honor and dignity.


When an advocate conducts his client's case, if the court, i.e. the judge, comments on his (advocate's) conduct, the court may be guilty of contempt. (35 C, W, N 179 = 56 C 74 = 1931 Cal 256 = 1931 Cal; 15 C, W, N-189 = 1913 Cal 256 = 58 Cal 74).

 If the court calls a police guard during the hearing of a case and expels the lawyer from the courtroom without any justification, it is tantamount to contempt of court. (Prag Das Advocate V.Sir PC Agrwal'1975 ALI .LJ41; 1975 Cr. LJ 659)

 If the Lawyer Certificate issued by the Advocate regarding the stay order of the High Court is filed in any court, that court should adjourn the case according to the said Lawyer Certificate. Because Advocate is an officer of the court and he is responsible for that Lawyer Certificate. Disregarding or rejecting the information given in the Advocate's Certificate without trying to verify it would be an offense of contempt of court. (Harikishan Sing V. Chhotan Mahton) AIR 1951 Pat. 490; 1951 (Vol. 52) Cr. LJ, 638]


False accusations against advocates cannot be insulted:


False accusations about the conduct of his case against the advocate which embarrassed him to conduct the case later will be marked as contempt of court. (Anantalal Singha V. Alfred Henry Watson (1930) 58 Cal. 884.


It is contempt of court to insult the advocate so that the lawyer cannot perform his duties in the case under trial. (Thirumalaippa V. Kumaraswami, AIR 1956

Mad. 621 (1956) ILR Mad. 1239)




Advocates are entitled to special judicial benefits:


Advocates' statements during the course of the case are of special benefit. This right has been established by the following principles.


1. When a lawyer conducts a case, he enjoys absolute privileges.


2. If an advocate faithfully makes a defamatory statement during a lawsuit, he or she will not be liable.


3. No case can be filed against him.


4. No action can be taken against the plaintiff even if the advocate calls him a liar and a liar during the proceedings.


5. If an advocate calls a witness a scoundrel or a rascal during a lawsuit, his or her statement will still be treated as privileged.


Therefore no action can be taken against an advocate for making relevant defamatory statements during his legal work or during the proceedings. Whatever he says may not be true or exaggerated but in this case he will enjoy special benefits.


Expunge the irrelevant statement of the advocate in court:


In a pending case, a lawyer has complete freedom of law before he can argue for his client, and for this reason, if any comment is made which is not related to the "MERIT" or quality of the case concerned, it is not related to the case but to the professional character or conduct of the lawyer concerned. , Then such comments cannot be recorded as part of the judgment given by the court and must be removed from the record (Expunge). (1989) 31 D, L, R (A.D.) 183.


The rights of advocates are inviolable:


The rights of the client's attorney are infringing or "indefeasible" during the trial of an original case or the hearing of an appeal and cannot be infringed in any way. Because it is a universal provision of the principle of natural justice which, if denied, the judgment will be invalid. (6d, l, r65 (s, c)


The right to raise the issue of loss of confidence in the court




His appointed lawyer has the right to point out the circumstances in which a client has lost confidence in the court for not getting justice. MH Khondoker V. State (1960) DLR (SC) 124.


Contempt of court for threatening a lawyer:


The court will be contemptuous if either party to the lawsuit threatens the other party's lawyer; Because it is an obstacle to justice. State V. Abdul Aziz PLD (1962) Lahore, 335.


The lawyer cannot be held responsible for the performance of his professional duties:


(1993) 13BLD (AD) 152- A bench comprising Supreme Court, High Court Division, Justice Muhammad Anshar Ali and Justice Kazi Ebadul Haque. In the case of Mrs. Sigma Huda Advocate v. Isfaq Samad and other cases, the Hon'ble Court said, lawyer while acting under the instructions of his or her client, whether has a qualified privilege- An Advocate whether is entitled to special protection. ''


A legal adviser is not responsible for his or her legal opinion:


In this context, His Excellency (HCD) High Court Justice Md. Mozammel Haque and Justice Md. Nurul Islam in the judgment of Abdus Samad v. State case [BLC (1996) page 63] said, “A Legal Adviser cannot be made liable for the offense of forgery and criminal breach. of trust for giving his legal opinion ”


Lawyer arrested from court yard:


It is a serious insult to be arrested by a police officer while the case is being handled by a lawyer and to be taken to the police station with a handcuff. (Rajshahi Bar Council-v. Nathuram, A, I, R 1958 Raj: 189 (174): I, L, R (198) Raj: 964, 1956 CR, L, J 1350 (BD). 


It is an offense to contempt of court if a lawyer is arrested by a police officer on purpose while obstructing the proceedings or going to the High Court to file a case for any other nefarious purpose. Only mistaken and honest arrests will not be insulting. (Home Rustomji V. Sub-Inspector Baig, AIR 1944 Lah 196 (199-200) 46 cr.LJI (SB)




'Court' means the place used by the officers, staff and witnesses of the court as well as all parts of the court. This means that if a lawyer goes to court to appear in a case, if he is arrested, it would be a contempt of court, as it would interfere with the normal conduct of the court. Also, arresting a lawyer for good reason will not be a contempt of court. Moreover the Chamber of Advocates is considered part of the court special.


Exceptions to the privilege of the lawyer:


It is true that a lawyer enjoys the aforesaid legal privileges or privileges in carrying out his duties in the conventional judiciary, but if he does not take advantage of those privileges, he presents arguments in court on behalf of the client, which involves questions of court status. Of course, he cannot be given that much right.


Popular posts from this blog

Nehru खानदान की सच्चाई , Basic Knowledge of Nehru Family!

  Truth Of Nehru Surname  मोतीलाल नेहरू की 5 पत्नियाँ थीं। (1) स्वरूप रानी (2) थुसु रहमान बाई (3) मंजुरी देवी (4) एक ईरानी महिला (5) एक कश्मीरी महिला नंबर 1- स्वरूप रानी और नंबर 3- मंजुरि देवी को लेकर कोई समस्या नहीं है। दूसरी पत्नी थुसू रहमान बाई के पहले पति मुबारक अली थे। मोतीलाल की नौकरी, मुबारक अली के पास थी। मुबारक की आकस्मिक मृत्यु के कारण मोतीलाल थुसु रहमान बाई से निकाह कर लिये और परोक्ष रूप से पूरी संपत्ति के मालिक बन गये। थुसु रहमान बाई को मुबारक अली से 2 बच्चे पहले से ही मौजूद थे- (1) शाहिद हुसैन (2) जवाहरलाल, मोतीलाल द्वारा इन दोनों बच्चों शाहिद हुसैन और जवाहरलाल को थुसु रहमान बाई से निकाह करने की वजह से अपना बेटा कह दिया गया। प्रासंगिक उल्लेख:- जवाहरलाल की माँ थुसू रहमान बाई थी, लेकिन उनके पिता मुबारक अली ही थे। तदनुसार थुसू रहमान बाई से निकाह करने की वजह से मोतीलाल, जवाहरलाल नेहरू के पालक पिता थे। मोतीलाल की चौथी पत्नी एक ईरानी महिला थी, जिसे मुहम्मद अली जिन्ना नामक एक बेटा था मोतीलाल की 5 नंबर वाली पत्नी एक कश्मीरी महिला थी, यह मोतीलाल नेहरु की नौकरानी थी। इसको शेख अब्दुल

Supreme Court VC Video Conferencing Link

  ALL DAYS THIS LINKS ARE WORKING....NO CHANGES Seen. PLZ DONT MISUSE IT Video conferencing link common for all days. S.NO. COURT NO. COURT LINKS 1. Court No. 1 2. Court No. 2 3. Court No. 3 4. Court No. 4 5. Court No. 5 6. Court No. 6 7. Court No. 7 8. Court No. 8 9. Court No. 9          9A Court no.10   10. Court No. 11 11. Court No. 12 12. Court No. 13 13. Court No. 14

Maharashtra Health Directory Mobile and Email address DHO, Civil Surgeon , Directors

  Contacts Ministers Back Minister Name Contact No. Mail ID   Prof.Dr.Tanajirao Sawant Hon. Minister Public Health and Family Welfare     (O)     (F) Minister of State Name Contact No. Shri.  Hon. State Minister, Public Health 22886025 (O) 22023992 (F) Officers Name Contact No. Mail ID Project Director, Maharashtra State Aids Control Society 24113097/5619/5791   (O) Shri Shivanand Taksale (I.A.S.) CEO, State Health Assurance Society 24999203/204/205 (O)   Mantralaya State Public Health Department,  Mantralaya, Mumbai Telephone - 22610018 Officers Name Department / Section Telephone No in the workshop Expanded Mobile No Email IDs Subject Shri.Sanjay Khandare (I.A.S) Principal Secretary-1. 22617388 22632166 22617999 (F)             204         PA 216  Anti 211      Shri. N.Nawin Sona Secretary-2 22719030 / 22719031   202 / 244 PA 250   Shri. Shivdas Dhule  (PA Shri. Mohite

यहां किराए पर बीवी मिलती है एक साल के लिए

  आज  दुनिया में शायद ही कोई क्षेत्र होगा जहां औरतों ने अपने हुनर से पहचान न बनाई हो। फिर भी भारत के कई जगहों में महिलाओं से जुड़ी कुप्रथाएं आज भी चली आ रहीं है। कुछ प्रथाएं तो ऐसी हैं, जिनके बारे में सुनकर हर कोई हैरत में पड़ जाए कि क्या सच में ऐसा होता है! आज हम आपको मध्यप्रदेश और गुजरात के कुछ गावों में मानी जाने वाली एक ऐसी प्रथा के बारे में बताने जा रहे हैं, जिसे सुनकर आप भी दंग रह जाएंगे। यहां किराए पर दी जाती है बीवी दरअसल, भारत के मध्यप्रदेश में एक ऐसी जगह है, जहां महिलाओं को किराए पर अपनी बीवी बनाने का रिवाज है।   जी हां, मध्यप्रदेश के शिवपुरी गांव में 'धड़ीचा प्रथा' काफी प्रचलित है।   इस प्रथा के मुताबिक अमीर आदमी इस गांव की लड़कियों को बतौर बीवी किराए पर ले सकते हैं लेकिन यह बंधन जिंदगीभर का नहीं होता।  यह सौदा महीने या साल के हिसाब से होता है। चाल-ढाल से लेकर खूबसूरती भी देखते हैं लोग यहां आने वाले लोग महिलाओं और लड़कियों की चाल-ढाल और खूबसूरती को भी देखकर सौदा करते हैं। इसके बाद एक साल के लिए उसकी शादी करा कर विदाई दी जाती है। अब प्रशासन के खौफ के कारण यह दबे-छुपे

Bhopal Police Officers Inspectors Mobile Number and E mail ID


CISCE ICSE ISC Board Is Unrecognized Board By Maharashtra , Delhi , HRD , MP Etc.No Approval From Any State....

  CISCE IS OPERATING FAKE BOARD WITHOUT ACT OF PARLIAMENT OR STATE OR BY ANY EXECUTIVE ORDER.  NOT APPROVED BY ANY STATE OR CENTRAL CHEATING PUBLIC SINCE LAST 60 YEARS! In India  Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations (CISCE)is operating ICSE/ISC public examination without valid Approval/recognition . The ICSE and ISC is unrecognized Education board which is not established by any act or executive order. All the state boards and Central boards are established by act of state or executive orders . The certificate of ICSE and ISC have no legal value in absence of law. Since 1959 the CISCE is running education board without any legal backing. CISCE is one of the society registered at Delhi and have power to open school , library, etc but not education board.  CISCE has given declaration/ affidavits at various high courts that it is merely a society and no act or executive order is passed in favour of CISCE till date. Allahabad High Court Pavitra vs Union Of India And 2 Ors

Supreme Court Clerks Are Deciding Maintainability of Petition Not Judge

  CORRUPTION IN SUPREME COURT REGISTRY , NOT GIVING DIARY NUMBER AND REJECTING PETITION WITHOUT QUOTING APPROPRIATE SECTION OF SCR 2013. AS PER SC ORDER ONLY JUDGE CAN DECIDE MAINTAINABILITY OF PETITION Supreme Court of India P. Surendran vs State By Inspector Of Police on 29 March, 2019 10. Therefore, we hold that the High Court Registry could not have exercised such judicial power to answer the maintainability of the petition, when the same was in the realm of the Court. As the power of judicial function cannot be delegated to the Registry, we cannot sustain the order, rejecting the numbering/registration of the Petition, by the Madras High Court Registry. Accordingly, the Madras High Court Registry is directed to number the petition and place it before an appropriate bench. Dear Mr. MANUBHAI HARGOVANDAS PATEL  I am hereby directed to inform you that the document uploaded by you vide Ref. id No. 3754/2023 in view of prayers (a) and (b) the Writ

जज मजिस्ट्रेट कैसे बेईमानी करते है , कैसे इससे बचे!

  कई लोग कोर्ट जाते है और हार कर चले आते है। ऑर्डर पूंछने पर एक लाइन का आर्डर दिखा देते है जिसमे लिखा होता है कि petitioner या respondent ने कुछ नही कहा। बाहर आकर शिकायत करते है की जज ने उसकी points को माना ही नही और केस हार गया। आजकल जज भी dishonest हो गए है और सुप्रीम court की guidelines की अनुसार काम नही करते और निर्णय एक पक्ष की बात सुनकर कर देते है। सब हारे हुए लोग कहते है की उसके points order में नही add किए। ऐसा जज इसलिए करता है की अगर points add कर देगे तो निर्णय उलट जाएगा। हर पक्ष को अपनी सब बाते ऑर्डर में add करवाना चाहिए । अगर points नही add हुए तो यही समझा जाएगा की आपकी पास कोई facts या points नही थे और आप कोर्ट में मौन रहे।  अगर इस कारण आप कोर्ट में कोई केस हार गए है तो फिर से केस active करे और विजय प्राप्त करें क्योंकि केस के बाद आप नहीं ऑर्डर बोलता है।  आर्डर ठीक करने की कोई टाइमर लिमिट नही है। यह अनाचार आपको दिल्ली तक मिलेगा क्योंकि कोई भी detail और reasoned ऑर्डर नही पास करना चाहता। जज को गलती करने का अधिकार नही है और जज की गलती पर state हर्जाना देगा। वैसे कुछ जज नियम

Rs 1.69 Cr Expense Done For VC at Bombay High Court But No VIDEO CONFERENCE Link For Public

 ONLY JUSTICE GS PATEL PUBLISHING VC LINK IN CAUSELIST जनता का पैसा बर्बाद हो रहा है. कोई नहीं चाहता की जनता का पैसा और समय बचे।  ADVOCATES CANNOT ATTEND MULTIPLE COURTS DUE TO NO VC OPTION,PARTY IN PERSONS ALSO SUFFERING  सेवा की जगह तानाशाही कर रहे है JUDGES , बिना गद्दी के राजा है , सुप्रीम कोर्ट से कुछ नहीं सीखना चाहते .... At Delhi High Court VC link s are available at Causlist, at SC it is sent by Email. At MP HC IT department provide it on request . RTI Information 1. VC Guidelines or any for Bombay High Court with copy  2. Online Mentioning Email ID  before Hon\'ble Courts guidelines copy. 3. Total Amount of Expense Done for VC facility  at High Court between Jan 2020 to Dec 2022 by State or any. THIS COST FOR VIDEO CONFERENCING IS INCLUDING ALL BENCHES OF BOMBAY HIGH COURT Public Information Officer Bombay High Court: Shri Pankaj A. Patki 2665857 2662488 Presiding Officer 8208405880(M) __ __________________

Limitation Act Applicable In Contempt Petition For Condonation Of Delay

  NINE YEARS DELAY CONDONE BY COURT AS RESPONDENT STILL DOING CONTEMPT . Cites 18 docs - [ View All ] Section 20 in the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Article 215 in The Constitution Of India 1949 the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 The Special Courts Act, 1979 Pallav Sheth vs Custodian & Ors on 10 August, 2001 Citedby 0 docs S.G.L. Degree College vs Sri Aditya Nath Das, Ias And ... on 24 October, 2018 Smt. Kusumbai W/O Harinarayan ... vs M/S Shreeji Builders And ... on 14 November, 2019 Yogesh Vyas vs Rajesh Tiwari on 31 July, 2019 Sunil Kumar vs Girish Pillai on 31 July, 2019 Pramod Pathak vs Heera Lal Samriya & Others on 13 December, 2021 Madras High Court M.Santhi vs Mr.Pradeed Yadav on 11 April, 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.04.2018 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM CONTEMPT PETITION No.377 of 2018 M.Santhi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Mr.Pradeed Yadav, I.A.S, Secretary to Government, School Education (HSE-1)