India: 3 लाख बच्चे फर्जी बोर्ड मे फिर बैठेंगे, बिना सरकारी अनुमति के बोर्ड को नेताओ का आशीर्वाद प्राप्त

 

सिर्फ tution class के जैसे value है ICSE ISC की 

 CISCE IS OPERATING FAKE BOARD WITHOUT ACT OF PARLIAMENT OR STATE OR BY ANY EXECUTIVE ORDER. 

NOT APPROVED BY ANY STATE OR CENTRAL

CHEATING PUBLIC SINCE LAST 60 YEARS!

In India Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations (CISCE)is operating ICSE/ISC public examination without valid Approval/recognition . The ICSE and ISC is unrecognized Education board which is not established by any act or executive order. All the state boards and Central boards are established by act of state or executive orders . The certificate of ICSE and ISC have no legal value in absence of law. Since 1959 the CISCE is running education board without any legal backing. CISCE is one of the society registered at Delhi and have power to open school , library, etc but not education board. 

CISCE has given declaration/ affidavits at various high courts that it is merely a society and no act or executive order is passed in favour of CISCE till date.

Allahabad High Court

Pavitra vs Union Of India And 2 Ors. on 15 December, 2014

Bench: Ashwani Kumar Mishra

4. Learned counsel for the Board, at the very outset, raised an objection that the Board is not a 'public authority', in view of Section 2(h) of the Act, and consequently, it is not required to provide the information sought by the petitioners, under the Act. Substantiating the objection, Sri Nagar submits that the Board is a society registered under the provisions of the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and is not receiving any financial grant or aid from the Central or the State Government. He further submits that Board is not a creation of any Act of Legislature, and therefore, necessary ingredients to hold the Board as a 'public authority', under Section 2(h) of the Act, are lacking, and consequently, the prayer made in the writ petition is not liable to be granted.

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/170083046/

 

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Dinesh Sinha&Anr vs Council For The India School .

.. on 1 September, 2016

 

3........Bearing in mind the said regulations and in view of the definition clause under section 2(a) of RTI Act, 2005 'appropriate Government' means in relation to a public authority which is established, constituted, owned controlled or substantially financed by funds provided directly and indirectly by the Central Government or the Union territory administration or by the State Government and further that the Council is established under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 is not under the control of the Ministry of Human Resource Development.”

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/154299322/

 

CIC/CC/A/2015/001885 Dharamraj Kumar Kushwaha v. PIO, CBSE , Decided on: 13.01.2017

“3. Mr. J.K. Das, Senior advocate representing CISCE stated that the Council’s origin being established by the University of Cambridge legally with the assistance of the interested Board for Indians by the Societies Registration Act No XXI of 1860 it does not fall within the definition clause of 2(h)(d)(ii) of the RTI Act and thus, cannot be said to be a public body in possession of a document. “

Case No. CIC/DS/C/2013/000542/MOHRD/MP ,Mukesh Jain VS CISCE, Date of Decision : 27th September, 2017

“5. The respondent stated that complainant’s identical RTI application dated 30.11.2011 had been adjudicated by the Commission in case No. CIC/DS/C/2013/000633 vide its order dated 15.07.2016 while relying upon the various decisions of the Commission, Hon’ble Allahabad High Court judgment dated 15.12.2014 in the matter of A. Pavitra Vs. UOI &Ors (WPC No. 60338/2014 that CISCE was not covered by the definition of ‘public authority since it is neither funded nor controlled by the Government or any other public body. He further stated that the Council for the 3 Indian School Certificate Examinations is an unaided autonomous educational body registered as a Society under the Societies Registration Act and conducting examinations for Classes X and XII for the students of its affiliated schools. The Council did not fall within the definition of the ‘public authority’ and was not amenable to release information under the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005.”

 

Central Information Commission,Ms. OlivaJohncyvs Council For Indian School ... on 25 February, 2010 .Decision No. CIC/SG/C/2010/000190/6980

“The Commission in an earlier Decision no. CIC/SG/C/2009/000585/3779 had observed that the Council is an autonomous educational body registered under the Societies Act. The Council is neither established under any law nor is it owned, controlled or financed by the Government. Therefore, the Section 2 (h) of the RTI Act does not apply to the Council. The Council had added that the aspect of applicability of the provisions of RTI Act to the Council has been challenged in the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in WP (C) No. 8537/2008 titled CISCE v. CIC &Anr wherein the order of the Commission has been stayed by the Court vide order dated 02/12/2008.”

 

As per RTI Reply from Delhi and Maharashtra CISCE (ICSE /ISC ) Boards are not recognised by state govt. The HRD also denied their recognition. The District education officer of Gwalior submitted Affidavit at Punjab and Haryana High Court and provided the list of approved boards at Madhya Pradesh. The ICSE/ISC is missing in approved boards of MP State.

At Bombay High Court CISCE secretary Garry Arthoon (Cell/ Mobile Number 9910500869 ) filed affidavit that CISCE is recognised by all the states , UT and HRD . In PIL159/2016 (Civil side) the order confirmed the CISCE statement. But in PIL29/2020 (OS) Bombay High Court Garry Arthoon filed affidavit that Maharahtra State have no control On CISCE Boards. In the same court he filed contradictory affidavit.The CIC ordered HRD to conduct investigation against CISCE fake operations across the country(2500+ Schools) but HRD kept silent due to political pressure. Copy of CIC order in enclosed file. 

The papers which CISCE showing to innocent peoples are letters of few officers who have no such authority to recognise the education board. Some letters where found fake as per RTI reply.

The CISCE showing PIL 159/2016 Order of Bombay High Court as recognized board is passed by Mr Pradeep Nandrajog Ex CJ BHC who was also ICSE student as per record. He should recues the hearing as no one can be the judge of its own cause. Many advocates , Judges , Officers at top positions has passed 10/12th from ICSE board . Their certificates has no value in law and it is just like tuition . All these researches are available in public domain.Call for help 9702859636

Public should be aware of these facts before joining the ICSE/ISC Schools.

DOWNLOAD RTI REPLY