Skip to main content

US : Transgender Cannot Participate In School Athletic

 


NEW BILL PASSED TO STOP TRANSGENDER IN SCHOOL  WOMEN SPORTS





The US House of Representatives Thursday passed a bill prohibiting the participation of transgender individuals in school athletic programs. The bill, titled “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2023,” was approved along party lines, with the Republican majority in support of its passage.


Specifically, the bill targets transgender athletes whose assigned gender at birth was male. The bill states:


It shall be a violation… for a recipient of Federal financial assistance who operates, sponsors, or facilitates athletic programs or activities to permit a person whose sex is male to participate in an athletic program or activity that is designated for women or girls.


Any violation of the bill would fall under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. Title IX prohibits discrimination based on sex in federally funded education programs or activities. This prohibition extends to public elementary and secondary schools as well as colleges and universities.


However, there are exceptions for biological males training with females. The exception is permitted:


[S]o long as no female is deprived of a roster spot on a team or sport, opportunity to participate in a practice or competition, scholarship, admission to an educational institution, or any other benefit that accompanies participating in the athletic program or activity.


The text of the bill admits its own language is ambiguous. Section 2(e) states the phrase “any other benefit” is not clear. A study to determine “the adverse psychological, developmental, participatory, and sociological” outcomes of allowing biological males to compete in women’s sports will need to be conducted.


During its passage, Democrats in the House voiced their opposition to the bill. Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) tweeted her speech against the bills. She stated the “dangerous bill puts transgender kids in harm’s way and puts Politics Over Participation.” US President Joe Biden has also voiced opposition to the bill. He previously threatened to veto any legislation passed by the Senate. However, the Democratic-led Senate is unlikely to take up the bill.


The Republican federal effort to prohibit trans women from participating in women’s sports mirrors efforts at a state level. Within the past three years, states such as South Carolina, Florida, Idaho and Texas have all passed laws to limit transgender athletes to participating in sports consistent with their biological sex as designated on the athletes’ birth certificates.


Not all state efforts have been met with success. Utah’s Republican Governor Spencer Cox vetoed the state’s Student Eligibility in Interscholastic Activities. Cox cited concerns over at-risk trans youth who experience high rates of suicide. He also pointed to a stark statistical reality. Of the 75,000 student athletes in the state, four are transgender and one is a trans woman. However, the legislature overrode the veto. Subsequently, a court issued an injunction, stopping the administration of the law. In its place, a commission will determine athlete eligibility, when needed, on a case-by-case basis.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court VC Video Conferencing Link

  ALL DAYS THIS LINKS ARE WORKING....NO CHANGES Seen. PLZ DONT MISUSE IT Video conferencing link common for all days. S.NO. COURT NO. COURT LINKS 1. Court No. 1 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court01 2. Court No. 2 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court02 3. Court No. 3 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court03 4. Court No. 4 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court04 5. Court No. 5 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court05 6. Court No. 6 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court06 7. Court No. 7 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court07 8. Court No. 8 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court08 9. Court No. 9 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court09          9A Court no.10            https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court10 10. Court No. 11 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court11 11. Court No. 12 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court12 12. Court No. 13 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court13...

Bhopal Police Officers Inspectors Mobile Number and E mail ID

  OFFICERS LIST IGP TO TI POLICE OFFICERS CUG NUMBER LIST BHOPAL S.NO. POSTING RANK NAME P&T PBX CUG NO. E-MAIL 1 BHOPAL ADGP SHRI A SAI MANOHAR 2443599 407 9479990399 bhopalig@gmail.com 2 CITY/BPL DIG/CITY SHRI IRSHAD WALI 2443201 408 7049100401 dig_bhopal@mppolice.gov.in 3 DIG/ RANGE/ RURAL DIG/RURAL SHRI SANJAY TIWARI 2443499 305 7587628122 digbplrange09@gmail.com 4 BHOPAL SP (HQ) SHRI RAMJI  SHRIVASTAV 2443223 367 7049100405 sp_bhopal@mppolice.gov.in 5 BHOPAL SP (SOUTH) SHRI SAI KRISHNA THOTA 2443800 359 9479990500 spsouth_bhopal@gmail.com 6 BHOPAL SP (NORTH) SHRI VIJAY KUMAR KHATRI 2443320 377 9479990700 spnorth320@gmail.com 7 BHOPAL ASP (HQ) SMT RICHA COUBE 2677319 319 7587615141 asphqbpl@gmail.com 8 BHOPAL AIG SMT RASHMI MISHRA 2443804 9479990620 bhopalig@gmail.com 9 BHOPAL ASP(CYBER)CRIME VACANT 2920664 7587628201 asp.cybercrime-bpl@mppolice.gov.in 10 BHOPAL ASP(CRIME) SHRI GOPAL DHAKAD 2761651 ...

Maharashtra Health Directory Mobile and Email address DHO, Civil Surgeon , Directors

  Contacts Ministers Back Minister Name Contact No. Mail ID   Prof.Dr.Tanajirao Sawant Hon. Minister Public Health and Family Welfare     (O) min.familywelafre@gmail.com     (F) Minister of State Name Contact No. Shri.  Hon. State Minister, Public Health 22886025 (O) 22023992 (F) Officers Name Contact No. Mail ID Project Director, Maharashtra State Aids Control Society 24113097/5619/5791   (O) pd@mahasacs.org Shri Shivanand Taksale (I.A.S.) CEO, State Health Assurance Society 24999203/204/205 (O)   Mantralaya State Public Health Department,  Mantralaya, Mumbai Telephone - 22610018 Officers Name Department / Section Telephone No in the workshop Expanded Mobile No Email IDs Subject Shri.Sanjay Khandare (I.A.S) Principal Secretary-1. 22617388 22632166 22617999 (F)             204         PA 216  Anti 211   psec.pubhealth@maharashtra.gov.in...

Complaint At Bar Council Against Senior Advocate Ashish Kamat By Advocate Vijay Kurle Of Bombay High Court.....

ADVOCATE VIJAY KURLE, SEEKS DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST SENIOR ADVOCATE ASHISH KAMAT FOR HIS AMATEUR TRICKS IN PROTECTING WHITE COLLARED SCAMMERS Advocate Vijay Kurle known for fearlessly standing with the underprivileged victims of manipulation by powerful real estate sharks, corrupt private sector and government officials, who are out to tear the fabric of the society. Adv Vijay kurle and Adv Ashish kamat Recently Advocate Kurle wrote to ‘Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa’ seeking action against Senior Advocate Ashish Kamat for his juvenile conduct to delay prosecution of scammers of thousands of crores of government and insurance policyholder’s funds by private insurance companies and their senior officials.   Top private insurance companies, cheated the government and small-time policy holders, through the following dubious means - A. Enrolling ghost beneficiaries and collecting thousands of crores of government sponsored insurance premium, meant for the farmers and underp...

MP Police Directory DGP Mobile Number Sudhir Saxena

MADHYA PRADESH POLICE TELEPHONE DIRECTORY I D S N B R A N C H N A M E D E S I G N A I O N S T D  C O D E O F F I C E R E S I F A X 1 F A X 2 M O B I L E CUG E  M A I L A D D R E S S 1 1 D G P  O F F I C E S u r e n d r a  S i n h D G P 0 7 5 5 2 4 4 3 5 0 0 2 4 4 3 3 3 6 2 4 4 3 5 0 1 94 25 01 45 35 70 49 10 00 01 dgp mp @m ppo lic e.g ov .in C-1 0, Swa mi Da ya na nd N ag ar Bh op al 2 2 M i l i n d  K a n s k e r A D G / P S O 7 5 5 2 4 4 3 5 2 6 2 4 4 3 5 2 8 8 9 8 9 9 9 7 2 7 7 7 0 4 9 1 0 0 5 1 0  p s o d g p m p @ m p p o l i c e . g o v . i n  D - 2 / 1 9 , C h a r  I m l i 3 3 P r a d e e p  B h a t i y a J D . ( P  R ) 0 7 5 5 2 4 4 3 5 0 5 2 4 9 1 1 7 2 9 4 2 5 1 7 1 1 1 3 H - 3 9 5 , S a i  A d h a r s h i l a  B a r k h e d a 4 4 D . P .  J u g a d e P S  T o  D G P 0 7 5 5 2 4 4 3 5 0 2 9 8 2 6 0 3 6 5 9 3 7049100502 134-A SEC-Sarvadharm Colony, 5 5 N . K .  S h r i v a s t a v a P S  T o...

Free Cancer Treatment at Sheth Shree Rasiklal Manikchandji Dhariwal Cancer Hospital Valsad

  *सूरत, गुजरात से मुम्बई के राजमार्ग पर सूरत से ७८ किलोमीटर  वलसाड से 16 km ( सुरतकी तरफ)  पर वाघलधारा गाँव है । राइट हेंड साइड पर आपको "श्री प्रभव हेम कामधेनु गीरीविहार ट्रस्ट, पालीताणा" संचालित "श्री रसिकलाल माणिकचंद धारीवाल कैंसर हॉस्पिटल" की कमान दिखाई देगी । हजारो चोरस मिटर मै फैला फल, फूल, खेत से हराभरा ये संकुल कोई आश्रम से कम नही। यहाँ अति सुंदर  जैन मंदिर एवं विशाल भोजन शाला भी है । ऒंर यहां की गौंशाला में करीब 400  देशी गाय है । यहां कैंसर के मरीज़ (दर्दी) एवं एक साथी को 10 दिन उपचार एवं ट्रेनिंग के लिए रखा जाता है । 80 बेड उपलब्ध है।  नास्ता, लंच और डिनर के समय दर्दी से मिल सकते है।* *सुबह ९ बजे आपको सिर्फ ५० रुपये मे केस निकलवाना है । अपने साथ मरीज़ (दर्दी) की केस फाइल एवं अगर ऑपरेशन, केमो करवाई हो तो वो साथ ले जानी है । सुबह १०.३० से १२.३० और दोपहर ३.३० से ५.३० दरमियान डॉक्टर द्वारा दर्दी की जांच के बाद १० दिन के लिए एडमिट किया जाता है । केवल दर्दी एवं एक साथी को ही प्रवेश की अनुमति है। ऐसी स्थिति में दर्दी को बिलकुल मुफ्त एवं साथी को ११ दिन क...

तोता पालने पर जेल जाओगे , कैद में रखना crime, Parrot Caging

  Crime Under Section 49,51 Of  Wild Life Protection act  तोता पालना तो देश में कॉमन है, ऐसे में उसको पिंजड़े में रखना भी अपराध है? वाइल्डलाइफ एक्ट के मुताबिक,  तोते या किसी अन्य पक्षी को पिंजड़े में कैद करके रखना और उससे किसी भी तरह का लाभ लेने के लिए प्रशिक्षण देना कानूनन अपराध है । भारत में कानून इजाजत नहीं देता कि किसी भी पक्षी को कैद करके रखा जाए। आम तौर पर नागरिक तोतों को पालतू पक्षी मानते हैं लेकिन वन्यजीव अधिनियम 1972 की धारा-4 के तहत इसे या किसी भी अन्य पक्षी को पिंजरे में कैद रखना या पालना गैरकानूनी है। वन्य प्राणी संरक्षण अधिनियम 1972 के अंतर्गत तोता को पालना या पिंजरे में कैद करना दंडनीय अपराध है। यदि किसी व्यक्ति ने तोता पाल रखा हो या उसे पिंजरे में कैद रखा हो तो वन विभाग के नजदीकी कार्यालय में सुपुर्द कर दें। देश भर में तोतों की करीब एक दर्जन प्रजातियां मौजूद हैं और सभी संरक्षित हैं। नियमानुसार तोतों को पालने के लिए वन विभाग की अनुमति जरूरी होती है, लेकिन उन्हें पिंजरे में बंद करने वाले यह अनुमति नहीं लेते हैं। लोग शौकिया तौर पर पिंजरों में रंग-बिरंगे प...

Chhattisgarh CG Police Official Mobile numbers

    S.N.   Name   Designation Office   Cell/ Mobile No. Code Number DGP Office, PHQ, Raipur 1 Shri Ashok Juneja DGP 0771 2221100 94791- 90444 0771 2211201 2 Shri Bhagwati Singh PRO (DGP) 0771 2511850 - Intelligence 3 Dr. Aanand Chhabra IG, Intelligence 0771 2436525 94252- 58168 0771 2436200(F) - 4 Shri Abhishek Maheshwari AIG (Intelligence)     90986- 73147 5 Shri M.L. Kotwani AIG (Intelligence) 0771 2436526 94252- 34323 P&P/Technical Services/Telecom/Traffic/Rail/Cyber/...

IPO Fraud By Bharat Global Developer Limited ......

  भारत ग्लोबल डेवलपर लिमिटेड शेयर बिना सेबी की मंजूरी के लिस्ट हो गया और निवेशकों को अरबों का चूना लगाया।  सेबी चेयरमैन और बड़े अधिकारी बीएसई  पर कोई कार्यवाही नहीं कर रहे ।  भारी घूस लेने की आशंका ! रक्षक ही भक्षक बना! Mumbai: Gujrat based company Bharat Global Developer Limited ie BGDL listed at BSE on 21 March 1995 without SEBI compliance.As per SEBI RTI Reply the BGDL has not done SEBI compliance and BSE listed it against regulator permission. BSE done it for  exchange charges and cheated innocent investors.Recently SEBI banned BGDL share trading in Dec 2024 for misleading orders announcement. On 11 April 2025  SEBI permitted BGDL share trading without checking SEBI compliance certificate. SEBI Whole time director SEBI Shri Kamlesh Chandra Varshney corruptly lifted ban on trading inspite of many complaints . SEBI new chairman Tuhin Kanta pandey and others WTD are silent on complaint of no IPO compliance by BGDL and BSE crime. The corrupt SEBI officers a...

ACB Judge Mumbai Want To Argue Matter Without Case Number

  ACB JUDGE SHASHIKALA S NAGUR MUMBAI SESSION WANT TO ARGUE MATTER WITHOUT CASE NUMBER. WHY JUDGE GIVING SPECIAL TREATMENT TO THIS CASE? ALL THE CASES ARE ARGUING DURING FILING STAGE OR WITHOUT CAUSELIST LISTING? Mumbai: The complainant filed three contempt petitions against ACB MUMBAI officers for not registering Zero FIR against Thane District Judge SB Agarwal, ADJ Amit Shete and JMFC Smt GS Bora for doing corruption in judicial process under section 7&13 of PC ACT 1992. The ACB officers disobeyed SC Lalita Kumari directions and contempt filed as per para 3 of the Lalita Kumari judgment.  The registry raised maintainability question to petitioner .Petitioner referred SC judgment that registry cannot decide maintainability of petition. As per the ACB judge Shashikala verbal direction registry is not numbering contempt petition . Clerks are afraid to number petition as ACB officers are having well wishers in session court. They are insisting petitioner to argue with judge ...