Skip to main content

Mumbai: Judge के sign hide करने का कोई नियम नहीं certified copy मे: bombay high court RTI

 बिना जज के sign और seal के certified copy दी जा रही है बिना नियम के। ऐसे unsign order की कोई  value नही।

Sign और seal के बिना judgement नही बनता।




Mumbai: When ever a certified copy of order is applied to Bombay High Court the staff  supply it to applicant and writing sd in place of hon'ble Judge signature. When the question is asked with the section officer signing certified copy that under which rule the signatures of judge are hided in order then she said that there is probability of copying judges signature by persons so we are hiding judges signature since last 20 years approx. When applicant said to officer that Police will take action for this crime then officer said the it is SOP to mask judges signatures in order. As per visit many people said that many orders are unsigned and many are signed by no body has seen seal of judge in the order.  It can only be verified by certified copy. 

An RTI application was filed before BHC RTI department to know the provisions under which Hon'ble Judge signatures are hided then the PIO given whimsical reply that he did not understand the question. He also denied any such order or rule under which signature are masked . So no information is available at BHC RTI cell .

The Unsigned certified copy has no legal value as judgement is not signed and sealed . It can be called as draft of judgement . If a judgement is only signed and not sealed then also it can be called as draft . The Seal of Judge is important in judgement to call as judgement. Unsealed judgement is just a draft when judges share it with brother judges with signature  . 

A similar view has been reiterated by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in State of Bombay v. Geoffrey Manners & Co., AIR 1951 Bom. 49. The Bombay High Court had taken the view that unless the judgment is signed and sealed, it is not a judgment in strict legal sense and therefore, in exceptional circumstances, the order can be recalled and altered to a certain extent.

The Supreme court 3 judges bench said in the order Kushalbhai Ratanbhai Rohit & Ors vs State Of Gujarat on 6 May, 2014  that order must be signed and sealed . Judge can change his mindset any time before signing and he has power to do so in the interest of justice. If the certified copy is provided with unsigned order then it is true copy of judgement under section 76 of Evidence act . The officer provided the true copy of unsigned judgement without seal. The officer has no power to mask the signature as per law so he has provided true copy of unsealed and unsigned judgement in original as per record.

Public can file IA to hear the case again with proper legal opinion . 

Central Government Act
Section 76 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
76. Certified copies of public documents.—Every 1public officer having the custody of a public document, which any person has a right to inspect, shall give that person on demand a copy of it on payment of the legal fees therefor, together with a certificate written at the foot of such copy that it is a true copy of such document or part thereof, as the case may be, and such certificate shall be dated and subscribed by such officer with his name and his official title, and shall be sealed, whenever such officer is authorized by law to make use of a seal; and such copies so certified shall be called certified copies.—Every 3public officer having the custody of a public document, which any person has a right to inspect, shall give that person on demand a copy of it on payment of the legal fees therefor, together with a certificate written at the foot of such copy that it is a true copy of such document or part thereof, as the case may be, and such certificate shall be dated and subscribed by such officer with his name and his official title, and shall be sealed, whenever such officer is authorized by law to make use of a seal; and such copies so certified shall be called certified copies." Explanation.—Any officer who, by the ordinary course of official duty, is authorized to deliver such copies, shall be deemed to have the custody of such documents within the meaning of this section.

ALSO READ

Judgement To Be Signed And Sealed -SC


RTI QUESTION

 The Signature of Judges are masked or hided  in the certified copy by Bombay High Court Certified copy  department 

1. Information about the name of incharge registrar of certified department of OS and AS.

2. Copy of Order, rule or any under which judges  signature are masked in certified copies. 

3. Copy of such rules or any of para 2 certified by competent authority as per rule of law.

Registration Number /नोंदणी क्रमांक :LAJDP/R/2023/60449
Name /नावSapan Shrivastava
Date of Filing /भरणे तारीख :15/06/2023
Status /स्थिती :RTI REQUEST APPLICATION RETURNED TO APPLICANT /माहितीचा अधिकार विनंती अर्जदाराकडे परत
as on 16/06/2023
Remarks :- Your online RTI application has been forwarded to Public Information Officer,Hon.ble, High Court, Fort, Mumbai -400001. vide this office letter No.RTI-2023/60449/ C.R.222/ desk 10, dated 15/06/2023 and copy of the same has been forwarded to you for information.
View Document /दस्तऐवज पहा :Reply Document Not Attached
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number /टेलिफोन क्रमांक :
Email Id /ई-मेल आयडी :

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court VC Video Conferencing Link

  ALL DAYS THIS LINKS ARE WORKING....NO CHANGES Seen. PLZ DONT MISUSE IT Video conferencing link common for all days. S.NO. COURT NO. COURT LINKS 1. Court No. 1 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court01 2. Court No. 2 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court02 3. Court No. 3 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court03 4. Court No. 4 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court04 5. Court No. 5 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court05 6. Court No. 6 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court06 7. Court No. 7 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court07 8. Court No. 8 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court08 9. Court No. 9 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court09          9A Court no.10            https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court10 10. Court No. 11 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court11 11. Court No. 12 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court12 12. Court No. 13 https://sci-vc.webex.com/meet/court13...

Bhopal Police Officers Inspectors Mobile Number and E mail ID

  OFFICERS LIST IGP TO TI POLICE OFFICERS CUG NUMBER LIST BHOPAL S.NO. POSTING RANK NAME P&T PBX CUG NO. E-MAIL 1 BHOPAL ADGP SHRI A SAI MANOHAR 2443599 407 9479990399 bhopalig@gmail.com 2 CITY/BPL DIG/CITY SHRI IRSHAD WALI 2443201 408 7049100401 dig_bhopal@mppolice.gov.in 3 DIG/ RANGE/ RURAL DIG/RURAL SHRI SANJAY TIWARI 2443499 305 7587628122 digbplrange09@gmail.com 4 BHOPAL SP (HQ) SHRI RAMJI  SHRIVASTAV 2443223 367 7049100405 sp_bhopal@mppolice.gov.in 5 BHOPAL SP (SOUTH) SHRI SAI KRISHNA THOTA 2443800 359 9479990500 spsouth_bhopal@gmail.com 6 BHOPAL SP (NORTH) SHRI VIJAY KUMAR KHATRI 2443320 377 9479990700 spnorth320@gmail.com 7 BHOPAL ASP (HQ) SMT RICHA COUBE 2677319 319 7587615141 asphqbpl@gmail.com 8 BHOPAL AIG SMT RASHMI MISHRA 2443804 9479990620 bhopalig@gmail.com 9 BHOPAL ASP(CYBER)CRIME VACANT 2920664 7587628201 asp.cybercrime-bpl@mppolice.gov.in 10 BHOPAL ASP(CRIME) SHRI GOPAL DHAKAD 2761651 ...

Maharashtra Health Directory Mobile and Email address DHO, Civil Surgeon , Directors

  Contacts Ministers Back Minister Name Contact No. Mail ID   Prof.Dr.Tanajirao Sawant Hon. Minister Public Health and Family Welfare     (O) min.familywelafre@gmail.com     (F) Minister of State Name Contact No. Shri.  Hon. State Minister, Public Health 22886025 (O) 22023992 (F) Officers Name Contact No. Mail ID Project Director, Maharashtra State Aids Control Society 24113097/5619/5791   (O) pd@mahasacs.org Shri Shivanand Taksale (I.A.S.) CEO, State Health Assurance Society 24999203/204/205 (O)   Mantralaya State Public Health Department,  Mantralaya, Mumbai Telephone - 22610018 Officers Name Department / Section Telephone No in the workshop Expanded Mobile No Email IDs Subject Shri.Sanjay Khandare (I.A.S) Principal Secretary-1. 22617388 22632166 22617999 (F)             204         PA 216  Anti 211   psec.pubhealth@maharashtra.gov.in...

Complaint At Bar Council Against Senior Advocate Ashish Kamat By Advocate Vijay Kurle Of Bombay High Court.....

ADVOCATE VIJAY KURLE, SEEKS DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST SENIOR ADVOCATE ASHISH KAMAT FOR HIS AMATEUR TRICKS IN PROTECTING WHITE COLLARED SCAMMERS Advocate Vijay Kurle known for fearlessly standing with the underprivileged victims of manipulation by powerful real estate sharks, corrupt private sector and government officials, who are out to tear the fabric of the society. Adv Vijay kurle and Adv Ashish kamat Recently Advocate Kurle wrote to ‘Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa’ seeking action against Senior Advocate Ashish Kamat for his juvenile conduct to delay prosecution of scammers of thousands of crores of government and insurance policyholder’s funds by private insurance companies and their senior officials.   Top private insurance companies, cheated the government and small-time policy holders, through the following dubious means - A. Enrolling ghost beneficiaries and collecting thousands of crores of government sponsored insurance premium, meant for the farmers and underp...

MP Police Directory DGP Mobile Number Sudhir Saxena

MADHYA PRADESH POLICE TELEPHONE DIRECTORY I D S N B R A N C H N A M E D E S I G N A I O N S T D  C O D E O F F I C E R E S I F A X 1 F A X 2 M O B I L E CUG E  M A I L A D D R E S S 1 1 D G P  O F F I C E S u r e n d r a  S i n h D G P 0 7 5 5 2 4 4 3 5 0 0 2 4 4 3 3 3 6 2 4 4 3 5 0 1 94 25 01 45 35 70 49 10 00 01 dgp mp @m ppo lic e.g ov .in C-1 0, Swa mi Da ya na nd N ag ar Bh op al 2 2 M i l i n d  K a n s k e r A D G / P S O 7 5 5 2 4 4 3 5 2 6 2 4 4 3 5 2 8 8 9 8 9 9 9 7 2 7 7 7 0 4 9 1 0 0 5 1 0  p s o d g p m p @ m p p o l i c e . g o v . i n  D - 2 / 1 9 , C h a r  I m l i 3 3 P r a d e e p  B h a t i y a J D . ( P  R ) 0 7 5 5 2 4 4 3 5 0 5 2 4 9 1 1 7 2 9 4 2 5 1 7 1 1 1 3 H - 3 9 5 , S a i  A d h a r s h i l a  B a r k h e d a 4 4 D . P .  J u g a d e P S  T o  D G P 0 7 5 5 2 4 4 3 5 0 2 9 8 2 6 0 3 6 5 9 3 7049100502 134-A SEC-Sarvadharm Colony, 5 5 N . K .  S h r i v a s t a v a P S  T o...

Free Cancer Treatment at Sheth Shree Rasiklal Manikchandji Dhariwal Cancer Hospital Valsad

  *सूरत, गुजरात से मुम्बई के राजमार्ग पर सूरत से ७८ किलोमीटर  वलसाड से 16 km ( सुरतकी तरफ)  पर वाघलधारा गाँव है । राइट हेंड साइड पर आपको "श्री प्रभव हेम कामधेनु गीरीविहार ट्रस्ट, पालीताणा" संचालित "श्री रसिकलाल माणिकचंद धारीवाल कैंसर हॉस्पिटल" की कमान दिखाई देगी । हजारो चोरस मिटर मै फैला फल, फूल, खेत से हराभरा ये संकुल कोई आश्रम से कम नही। यहाँ अति सुंदर  जैन मंदिर एवं विशाल भोजन शाला भी है । ऒंर यहां की गौंशाला में करीब 400  देशी गाय है । यहां कैंसर के मरीज़ (दर्दी) एवं एक साथी को 10 दिन उपचार एवं ट्रेनिंग के लिए रखा जाता है । 80 बेड उपलब्ध है।  नास्ता, लंच और डिनर के समय दर्दी से मिल सकते है।* *सुबह ९ बजे आपको सिर्फ ५० रुपये मे केस निकलवाना है । अपने साथ मरीज़ (दर्दी) की केस फाइल एवं अगर ऑपरेशन, केमो करवाई हो तो वो साथ ले जानी है । सुबह १०.३० से १२.३० और दोपहर ३.३० से ५.३० दरमियान डॉक्टर द्वारा दर्दी की जांच के बाद १० दिन के लिए एडमिट किया जाता है । केवल दर्दी एवं एक साथी को ही प्रवेश की अनुमति है। ऐसी स्थिति में दर्दी को बिलकुल मुफ्त एवं साथी को ११ दिन क...

तोता पालने पर जेल जाओगे , कैद में रखना crime, Parrot Caging

  Crime Under Section 49,51 Of  Wild Life Protection act  तोता पालना तो देश में कॉमन है, ऐसे में उसको पिंजड़े में रखना भी अपराध है? वाइल्डलाइफ एक्ट के मुताबिक,  तोते या किसी अन्य पक्षी को पिंजड़े में कैद करके रखना और उससे किसी भी तरह का लाभ लेने के लिए प्रशिक्षण देना कानूनन अपराध है । भारत में कानून इजाजत नहीं देता कि किसी भी पक्षी को कैद करके रखा जाए। आम तौर पर नागरिक तोतों को पालतू पक्षी मानते हैं लेकिन वन्यजीव अधिनियम 1972 की धारा-4 के तहत इसे या किसी भी अन्य पक्षी को पिंजरे में कैद रखना या पालना गैरकानूनी है। वन्य प्राणी संरक्षण अधिनियम 1972 के अंतर्गत तोता को पालना या पिंजरे में कैद करना दंडनीय अपराध है। यदि किसी व्यक्ति ने तोता पाल रखा हो या उसे पिंजरे में कैद रखा हो तो वन विभाग के नजदीकी कार्यालय में सुपुर्द कर दें। देश भर में तोतों की करीब एक दर्जन प्रजातियां मौजूद हैं और सभी संरक्षित हैं। नियमानुसार तोतों को पालने के लिए वन विभाग की अनुमति जरूरी होती है, लेकिन उन्हें पिंजरे में बंद करने वाले यह अनुमति नहीं लेते हैं। लोग शौकिया तौर पर पिंजरों में रंग-बिरंगे प...

Chhattisgarh CG Police Official Mobile numbers

    S.N.   Name   Designation Office   Cell/ Mobile No. Code Number DGP Office, PHQ, Raipur 1 Shri Ashok Juneja DGP 0771 2221100 94791- 90444 0771 2211201 2 Shri Bhagwati Singh PRO (DGP) 0771 2511850 - Intelligence 3 Dr. Aanand Chhabra IG, Intelligence 0771 2436525 94252- 58168 0771 2436200(F) - 4 Shri Abhishek Maheshwari AIG (Intelligence)     90986- 73147 5 Shri M.L. Kotwani AIG (Intelligence) 0771 2436526 94252- 34323 P&P/Technical Services/Telecom/Traffic/Rail/Cyber/...

IPO Fraud By Bharat Global Developer Limited ......

  भारत ग्लोबल डेवलपर लिमिटेड शेयर बिना सेबी की मंजूरी के लिस्ट हो गया और निवेशकों को अरबों का चूना लगाया।  सेबी चेयरमैन और बड़े अधिकारी बीएसई  पर कोई कार्यवाही नहीं कर रहे ।  भारी घूस लेने की आशंका ! रक्षक ही भक्षक बना! Mumbai: Gujrat based company Bharat Global Developer Limited ie BGDL listed at BSE on 21 March 1995 without SEBI compliance.As per SEBI RTI Reply the BGDL has not done SEBI compliance and BSE listed it against regulator permission. BSE done it for  exchange charges and cheated innocent investors.Recently SEBI banned BGDL share trading in Dec 2024 for misleading orders announcement. On 11 April 2025  SEBI permitted BGDL share trading without checking SEBI compliance certificate. SEBI Whole time director SEBI Shri Kamlesh Chandra Varshney corruptly lifted ban on trading inspite of many complaints . SEBI new chairman Tuhin Kanta pandey and others WTD are silent on complaint of no IPO compliance by BGDL and BSE crime. The corrupt SEBI officers a...

ACB Judge Mumbai Want To Argue Matter Without Case Number

  ACB JUDGE SHASHIKALA S NAGUR MUMBAI SESSION WANT TO ARGUE MATTER WITHOUT CASE NUMBER. WHY JUDGE GIVING SPECIAL TREATMENT TO THIS CASE? ALL THE CASES ARE ARGUING DURING FILING STAGE OR WITHOUT CAUSELIST LISTING? Mumbai: The complainant filed three contempt petitions against ACB MUMBAI officers for not registering Zero FIR against Thane District Judge SB Agarwal, ADJ Amit Shete and JMFC Smt GS Bora for doing corruption in judicial process under section 7&13 of PC ACT 1992. The ACB officers disobeyed SC Lalita Kumari directions and contempt filed as per para 3 of the Lalita Kumari judgment.  The registry raised maintainability question to petitioner .Petitioner referred SC judgment that registry cannot decide maintainability of petition. As per the ACB judge Shashikala verbal direction registry is not numbering contempt petition . Clerks are afraid to number petition as ACB officers are having well wishers in session court. They are insisting petitioner to argue with judge ...