India RTI News

  Cigniti cum Coforge Compliance officer in the SCORES reply confirmed that they Listed in Hyderabad Stock exchange in 2005 without SEBI NOC and later at NSE -BSE as direct listing in 2012 as per reply . It is fraud with investors . Any time FIR can be filed for this SEBI act violation with section 15 HA action like Sahara case. It is interest free money without SEBI permission as per Company act 1956. Hyderabad exchange officials took bribe from companies and list their shares without SEBI compliance . As per SEBI 1992 circular all exchanges has to follow SEBI compliance before listing the shares ie SEBI NOC. By foul  play Cigniti listed at Hyderabad exchange and later listed at BSE and NSE by direct listing guidelines . Promoters sold 45 percent of their shares to public and got huge fund for business promotion. It is interest free money without SEBI NOC . 

  ACB JUDGE SHASHIKALA S NAGUR MUMBAI SESSION WANT TO ARGUE MATTER WITHOUT CASE NUMBER. WHY JUDGE GIVING SPECIAL TREATMENT TO THIS CASE? ALL THE CASES ARE ARGUING DURING FILING STAGE OR WITHOUT CAUSELIST LISTING? Mumbai: The complainant filed three contempt petitions against ACB MUMBAI officers for not registering Zero FIR against Thane District Judge SB Agarwal, ADJ Amit Shete and JMFC Smt GS Bora for doing corruption in judicial process under section 7&13 of PC ACT 1992. The ACB officers disobeyed SC Lalita Kumari directions and contempt filed as per para 3 of the Lalita Kumari judgment.  The registry raised maintainability question to petitioner .Petitioner referred SC judgment that registry cannot decide maintainability of petition. As per the ACB judge Shashikala verbal direction registry is not numbering contempt petition . Clerks are afraid to number petition as ACB officers are having well wishers in session court. They are insisting petitioner to argue with judge ...

* Police officers who betray their public duty to protect criminals or frame innocent persons will no longer enjoy impunity—they will face imprisonment and prosecution.*  Supreme Court’s recent Landmark Judgment — K.P. Tamilmaran v. State, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 958 — *Directly Applicable to the Cases of Disha Salian and Sushant Singh Rajput*: The Hon’ble Supreme Court’s judgment in K.P. Tamilmaran v. State, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 958, stands as a stern constitutional warning to all corrupt and dishonest police officers who abuse their official position to shield powerful accused persons and falsely implicate innocent citizens.  *In this case, the Court awarded life imprisonment to senior police officials who:*  *Deliberately delayed the registration of an FIR in a murder case for nine days, and*  *Falsely implicated the father of the deceased in serious criminal offences, thereby attempting to suppress the truth and derail justice.*  The Hon’ble Court condemned such co...

  हुंडई का आईपीओ घोटाला सामने आया , बिना सेबी के अनुमति के आईपीओ बेच डाला और निवेशकों को २८००० Cr  कर का चूना लगाया ....  Mumbai:The Hyundai Motors India Limited IPO Listed without SEBI Permission and cheated investors with Rs 27870 Cr .In the scores reply Compliance officer Pradeep Chug claimed the SEBI NOC but did not shared the copy . They have not cleared all the objection raised by SEBI in observation and floated IPO with the corrupt practice with NSE and BSE on 22 Oct 2024 . SEBI in the RTI reply said that they have not issued any permission to the hyundai motor India IPO. The Hyundai by the way of fraud received interest free Rs 27870 Cr for expansion. It is fraud with Investors and SEBI failed to protect the investors Under section 11 of SEBI act 1992. SEBI Officers are doing corruption with exchanges without following rule of law. As per law and SEBI circulars all the compliance is mandatory but agent bypass the procedure by corruption in SEBI corporate Finance D...

  बॉम्बे स्टॉक एक्सचेंज ने अपना शेयर बिना सेबी की मंजूरी के लिस्ट कर दिया , सेबी अधिकारियो ने भारी घूस खाई और निवेशकों को बेवकूफ बनाया।  RTI में सेबी ने कहा की BSE LIMITED के आईपीओ को कोई NOC नहीं दी गयी जो की कानूनी रूप से जरूरी है . Mumbai: BSE Limited IPO was listed on 3rd Feb 2017  at NSE and BSE. BSE has applied for IPO at SEBI for permission . As per RTI Reply SEBI has not issued any NOC or permission till date . Without SEBI Consent and compliance BSE limited listed its share at BSE Exchange and also at NSE  . It is violation of SEBI ICDR regulation . BSE IPO size was Rs 1243 Cr Approx. . Without SEBI Permission like Sahara the company using interest free public money. The SEBI officers has taken bribe and never taken objection for this crime against investors. Since 2017 the BSE shares are non genuine trading against investors interest .

  Mumbai: Corruption case under Prevention of corruption act is filed before Mumbai CBI cum ACB  Court for not taking action in Infosys IPO scam against SEBI, ROC Bangalore NSE and BSE officers. Infosys was listed in 1993 without SEBI compliance . The New SEBI Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey and Ex Chairman Madhabi Buch did not taken any action on complaint against Infosys fraud with investors . The copy of RTI also shared with them but the SEBI officers did not responded and not taken any action as per  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (PROCEDURE FOR HOLDING.  INQUIRY  AND IMPOSING PENALTIES BY ADJUDICATING OFFICER)  RULES ,  1995 SEBI officers whenever want take lead from social media but by complaint through Scores and email are neglected by taking bribe . The SEBi denied action as per section 15 HA of SEBI act and various sections of Company act . They have incurred Rs 1lac Cr approx loss to exchequer by not registering crime. Being a investigati...